Dave Snowden, creator of the Cynefin framework, is a leading voice in the fields of complexity science, knowledge management, and sense-making.[1][2] His work provides a powerful lens for understanding and acting within the various situations leaders and organizations face. The core of his teaching is to move away from "one-size-fits-all" management theories and instead tailor approaches to the specific context.[3]
Lesson 1: Not All Problems Are the Same — Understand Your Context
The foundational lesson from Snowden is that we must first diagnose the nature of the situation we are in before deciding how to act. The Cynefin framework is a "sense-making device" that offers five distinct contexts, or domains, each with its own characteristics and required leadership approach.[4][5][6]
- Clear (formerly Simple or Obvious): The Domain of Best Practice.
- Characteristics: The relationship between cause and effect is clear to everyone. The situation is stable, and the right answer is known and undisputed.[7][8]
- Approach: Sense - Categorize - Respond. You assess the facts, categorize the issue, and apply the established best practice or rule.[6][7] This is the domain of checklists and standard operating procedures.[5][6]
- Danger: Complacency. Success can breed oversimplification, leading leaders to force problems into this domain when they belong elsewhere. This can lead to catastrophic failure.
- Complicated: The Domain of Good Practice.
- Characteristics: There is a clear relationship between cause and effect, but it requires analysis or expertise to see it.[7][9] There are multiple right answers, and the domain is governed by "known unknowns."
- Approach: Sense - Analyze - Respond. You engage experts or conduct analysis to assess the situation, determine a course of action, and execute it.[7] This is the realm of engineers, doctors, and other experts.
- Danger: Analysis paralysis and the tendency of experts to be constrained by their own fields of knowledge. When experts disagree, a different approach is needed.[10]
- Complex: The Domain of Emergence.
- Characteristics: The relationship between cause and effect can only be understood in retrospect.[5][7] This is the domain of "unknown unknowns," where outcomes are unpredictable.[5] Many modern business challenges, like cultural change and market disruption, reside here.[5][7]
- Approach: Probe - Sense - Respond. You cannot predict the right answer, so you must conduct experiments to see what works.[7][10] Run multiple parallel, safe-to-fail probes to discover patterns.[10][11] Based on what you learn, you amplify what works and dampen what doesn't.
- Danger: The temptation to apply command-and-control management styles that are destined to fail in a complex environment.
- Chaotic: The Domain of Rapid Response.
- Characteristics: There is no discernible relationship between cause and effect. The situation is a crisis, and the immediate priority is to establish order.[4][7]
- Approach: Act - Sense - Respond. The leader must act immediately and decisively to impose constraints and "staunch the bleeding."[4][6][7] The goal is to turn the chaotic situation into a complex one, where you can then begin to probe for solutions.
- Danger: Abusing the power required in this domain or being trapped in a crisis-management mode. Chaos can also be deliberately induced on a small scale to foster innovation.[9]
- Confused (formerly Disorder): The Unclear Domain.
- Characteristics: This is the space of not knowing which of the other domains you are in.[5][7]
- Approach: Break the situation down into its constituent parts and assign each to one of the other four domains.[7] This is a crucial step to avoid interpreting the situation according to your personal preference for action.[3]
Lesson 2: "Sense-Making" Precedes Decision-Making
Snowden defines sense-making as, "how can you make sense of the world so that you can act in it?"[10] This is not about having perfect knowledge, but about knowing enough to act effectively.[10][12]
- Naturalistic Sense-Making: His approach is rooted in the natural sciences, using disciplines like anthropology and neuroscience as constraints.[10][13] This means accepting cognitive biases and the physical limits of human decision-making, such as the fact that we don't scan all available data before acting.[10]
- Sufficiency Over Optimization: The goal is not to find the single "best" answer (optimizing) but the first one that works (satisficing). This is based on Gary Klein's research showing that humans make decisions based on first-fit pattern matching, not by weighing all possible options.[14]
Lesson 3: In Complexity, You Manage the Constraints, Not the People
In a complex system, you cannot engineer a desired outcome.[15] Direct causality is not visible, and trying to impose order will have unintended consequences.[15][16]
- Enabling Constraints: Instead of top-down directives, leaders should create "enabling constraints." These are guiding principles or boundaries that allow solutions to emerge from the interactions within the system.[4][17]
- Focus on Interactions, Not Behaviors: Don't try to change people's behaviors directly. Instead, change the environment and the way people interact, and new behaviors will emerge.[15] You are "changing the environment in which people will make decisions rather than making the decisions."[15]
- Look for the "Adjacent Possible": In a complex system, you cannot plan a long journey to a predetermined future state. You can only find out where you are, see what the next possible step is, take it, and then reassess from the new position.[15]
Lesson 4: Narrative and Micro-Stories are Critical Data
Snowden places immense value on narrative as a way to understand the real culture and knowledge of an organization. Raw stories, anecdotes, and experiences contain more truth than formal reports or survey answers.
- Narrative as a Sensory Network: Collecting stories from employees and customers acts as a real-time feedback network. It allows leaders to detect weak signals and understand the "dispositional state" of the system—the probabilities of what might happen next.[14][15]
- Making People Their Own Ethnographers: Using tools like SenseMaker®, individuals can interpret their own experiences. This scales data collection without the intermediary bias of researchers or managers, providing a more authentic picture of the organization.[13][18]
- More Powerful than Direct Questions: Narrative is a better mechanism for recalling hidden or tacit knowledge than direct questioning. People often only know what they know when they need to know it, a context that storytelling provides.[13][14]
Lesson 5: Design for Resilience, Not Robustness (Safe-to-Fail, Not Fail-Safe)
Traditional management seeks to build fail-safe systems that are robust and never break. Complexity thinking recognizes that failure is inevitable.[19]
- Robust vs. Resilient: Robust systems are strong but brittle; when they break, they collapse catastrophically. Resilient systems can adapt and change because they are not rigidly constrained.[13]
- Safe-to-Fail Probes: In the complex domain, you must embrace experimentation. These experiments should be "safe-to-fail," meaning they are small enough that their failure provides valuable learning without bringing down the whole system.[10][11] The key is to run multiple parallel probes, not just one pilot project, to get a true sense of what works.[10]
Lesson 6: Leadership is Contextual and Often Indirect
A leader's role changes dramatically depending on the domain. Good leadership is about adapting your style to the context.[9]
- Good Leaders Rarely Make Decisions: Snowden argues that if a senior leader has to make a decision, it's often a sign of failure. Their role is to create the conditions for good decisions to be made by others.[20]
- Distributed Decision-Making: Except in a crisis (the Chaotic domain), leaders should distribute decision-making to those with the most context at the micro-level and centralize coordination.[17][20]
- Leaders as Pattern-Sensors: A leader's primary job is not to be an analyst but to sense patterns, listen for anomalies, and explore the stories coming from the field.[13]
Sources
