Lessons from Eric Weinstein

Eric Weinstein is a mathematician, economist, and host of "The Portal" podcast. Weinstein is known for his complex ideas and critiques of established institutions. His work often encourages independent thinking and a departure from conventional narratives.

On Truth, Meaning, and Reality

"My four things I care about are truth, meaning,fitness and grace." [1] This quote encapsulates Weinstein's core values, which he frequently references as the pillars of a meaningful life.
"The official idealism of every age is usually the cover story of its thefts." [2] Weinstein suggests that publicly espoused ideals often mask self-serving or exploitative actions by those in power.
"Reality is its own exegesis." [3] This philosophical statement implies that reality is its own explanation or interpretation, and there's no external tool to fully grasp it.
"We are now gods, but for the wisdom." [4] Weinstein reflects on humanity's advanced technological capabilities, such as synthetic biology and nuclear power, cautioning that our wisdom has not kept pace with our power. [4]
"Love is so important." [2][5] A simple yet profound statement Weinstein often makes, emphasizing the fundamental role of love in human experience.
"The most dangerous thing a movement can endeavor to do is to purify or create a utopia." [6] He warns against the fanaticism of ideological purity, citing historical examples where such pursuits led to atrocities. [6]
"We are waves in a medium. The medium is called a bundle." [3] This is a simplified explanation of his Geometric Unity theory, suggesting our existence is more complex than we perceive. [3]
"I think it's a disgrace, and we can't talk about it - which is the fascinating part. That we are effectively losing our society because we're afraid to say certain things because we're being made afraid to say certain things." [7][8] Weinstein on the erosion of free speech and the societal consequences of self-censorship. [7][8]
"I'm really only interested in building this intellectual movement. The I.D.W. has bigger goals than anyone's buzz or celebrity." [2][5] Speaking about the "Intellectual Dark Web," he emphasizes its purpose as a movement for deeper intellectual engagement rather than personal fame. [2][5]
"If you're allowing the political environment to infect your relationships, it's time to bury the hatchets." [2][5] A call for preserving personal relationships amidst polarizing political climates.

On Learning and Education

"Every subject is much easier than the people who wish to make money teaching it would have you know." [1][4] Weinstein argues that for most subjects, one can grasp 80% of the core concepts with a small fraction of the effort typically demanded by formal education. [1]
"The jack of one trade is the connector of none." [1] He challenges the traditional wisdom of "jack of all trades, master of none," suggesting that interdisciplinary knowledge is crucial for innovation.
"I wasn't meant for educators, as those are actually their issues with me (i.e. teaching disabilities)." [4][9] Weinstein reframes his own learning differences (like dyslexia and ADD) not as disabilities but as "teaching disabilities" on the part of the educational system. [4][9]
"A lot of parents have kids who are bright and smart and creative. And those kids are bringing home grades that are just so depressing... In the standard sense, that population is probably [considered] learning disabled, but they are our future innovators." [10] He believes that those who struggle within the rigid confines of the school system are often the most creative and innovative thinkers. [10]
"People become incredibly inventive when they become isolated and terrified." [10] Weinstein suggests that adversity and isolation can be powerful catalysts for creativity and invention.
"Dear Google, stop teaching my girl that her path to financial freedom lies not in coding but in complaining to HR." [2] A critique of what he sees as a counterproductive emphasis on grievance over skill-building in some modern corporate and educational environments.
"Measure the failure of your original hope. Measure… 'How badly did it go wrong?' Once you have that, make that new object the centerpiece of a new theory. And you'll actually build something much more beautiful than the original theory ever was." [10] A philosophy on how to learn and create from failure by making the failure itself the subject of study.
"You can rearrange any subject to learn most of it very, very quickly. The bad news is that it will feel terrible because you will be told that you are doing the wrong thing and dooming yourself to a life of mediocrity." [1] He encourages a non-linear, first-principles approach to learning, even if it goes against conventional methods.
"Too often, people who are crazy about truth reject scaffolding, which is an intermediate stage in getting to the final truth." [1] Weinstein points out that sometimes temporary beliefs or frameworks are necessary to build towards a more complete understanding, even if they are not entirely accurate in themselves.
"Follow your bliss, the adventure starts there." [11] This is a sentiment Weinstein shares, echoing Joseph Campbell's famous advice on finding one's path in life. [11]

On Institutions and Society

The Distributed Idea Suppression Complex (DISC): This is one of Weinstein's key concepts, describing a decentralized network of individuals and institutions that collectively suppress disruptive ideas that challenge the status quo, without any central coordination. [9]
The Embedded Growth Obligation (EGO): Weinstein defines this as the necessity for an institution or system to grow in order to maintain its honest positions and avoid collapse. [2][4] He argues that this pressure often leads to unsustainable or dishonest practices.
"There is never a good moment to stand up to incremental tyranny. By design." [2] A warning about the insidious nature of slowly encroaching control and the difficulty of choosing the right moment to resist.
"Harvard is really the fusion of two separate institutions. One is about brilliance and one is about power. And so you can think about this as the sharpest minds and the sharpest elbows." [7][8] His analysis of elite institutions like Harvard, suggesting a fundamental tension between the pursuit of knowledge and the exercise of power. [7][8]
"DEI is a parasitization of our best hopes and dreams." [7] A strong critique of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion initiatives, which he argues have been corrupted and now undermine their own stated goals. [7]
"There is one place left in which open racism can be practiced institutionally in the U.S. today, that is through this diversity/equity movement, in which it appears to be that you can be openly anti-white, openly anti-straight, openly anti-male, and this is considered progressive." [5] A controversial take on what he perceives as a form of prejudice embedded within some progressive movements.
"Organized civil disobedience is the correct next response to the prolonged, indefinite and deliberate abuse of exotic emergency powers inconsistent with being a free people in our own country." [2] A call to action against what he views as governmental overreach.
"Individuals in very small groups are about the only thing that is free of the disease of the embedded growth obligation." [2][5] He posits that true freedom and innovation are most likely to be found outside of large, established institutions.
"If you have a system which effectively functions in a cult-like way which is very few people who are academicians have ever left education... they start at kindergarten or pre-K... and that's what's going on." [6] A critique of the insular nature of academia, where many have little experience outside of the educational system.
"We have asked some of the world's most gifted and smartest people to devote their lives to the study of science and technology and we have inadequately prepared them... we need to take a hard look at how we've invested in science and technology." [12] Weinstein argues that society is underfunding and mismanaging its scientific talent.

On Physics and Geometric Unity

Geometric Unity: This is Weinstein's ambitious, and controversial, theory of everything that attempts to unify the fundamental forces of physics. [13][14] It proposes a 14-dimensional universe and seeks to resolve inconsistencies between general relativity and the Standard Model. [14][15]
"The arena is not spacetime. It's a different kind of a gadget called a bundle." [3] A core idea of Geometric Unity, suggesting that our understanding of the fundamental fabric of reality is incomplete. [3]
"The quantum is happening on a 14-manifold and the classical is happening on a four-manifold and they're not on the same space." [3] This is a more technical explanation from his theory, aiming to resolve the conflict between quantum mechanics and classical physics. [3]
"What really interests me is whether god had any choice in the creation of the world." [13] Quoting a question posed to Ernst Strauss by Albert Einstein, this reflects the driving philosophical question behind his search for a unified theory. [13]
"I used to carry the number 14 as a closely guarded secret in my life." [15] Referring to the 14 dimensions in his Geometric Unity theory, highlighting the personal and long-term nature of his work on this idea. [15]
"The problem is you have a group of people who don't feel that they have to listen to anything else. And if anything else happens then they say well we'll just call that string theory." [8] A critique of the string theory community's perceived resistance to alternative ideas.
"I believe that even if this theory were to turn out to be wrong... it would give us something to go on. We would at least have a first candidate of how a hopeful theory of everything would look and how it would go wrong." [12] His perspective on the value of proposing bold, even if potentially incorrect, theories to advance science.
"We've learned how not to take our dreams seriously how not to channel them into science how not to bring rigor to our imagination." [16] A lament for what he sees as a decline in ambitious, imaginative, and rigorous scientific pursuit.
"It's very important not to fetishize good science because that's humanity's death now." [16] He distinguishes between "good science" (incremental, safe) and "great science" (revolutionary, risky), arguing that an over-emphasis on the former stifles progress.
"The author finds supersymmetry unnecessarily confusing as an as-if symmetry and is uncomfortable saying much more about it." [17] A cryptic but telling statement from his paper on Geometric Unity, indicating his departure from mainstream theoretical physics concepts. [17]

On Personal Growth and Mindset

"Give yourself permission to be an imposter." [10] Encouragement to venture into new fields and take on challenges even if you don't feel fully qualified.
"Why you comparing your past to your present is physically impossible." [10] A reminder that personal growth means you are a different person than you were in the past, making direct comparisons flawed.
"Why you need arrogance sometimes." [10] Weinstein suggests that a degree of self-belief, which might be perceived as arrogance, is sometimes necessary to pursue unconventional ideas.
"If something is failing, there's an invisible force." [10] A prompt to look for the underlying, often hidden, reasons for failure.
"A gentleman is someone... who is never rude by accident." [6] An old definition he is partial to, emphasizing intentionality and skill in communication.
"You have to understand that the I.D.W. emerged as a response to a world where perfectly reasonable intellectuals were being regularly mislabeled by activists, institutions, and mainstream journalists with every career-ending epithet from 'Islamophobe' to 'Nazi.'" [5] Explaining the origins of the Intellectual Dark Web as a reaction to what he saw as unfair attacks on thinkers.
"Compare yourself only to your past self (not others) is the real game-changer." [11] Echoing a rule from Jordan Peterson's "12 Rules for Life," which Weinstein has recommended. [11]
"Once you start changing things, you can't stop." [18] A reflection on the cascading and often unpredictable consequences of innovation and intervention in complex systems.
"We are hackers. That's our comparative advantage." [18] Weinstein's view of humanity's essential nature as innovators and problem-solvers who manipulate their environment.
"I want to survive more than anything else. There's so many things that I love about this place. And I don't like the idea that we're all trapped here." [19] His motivation for advocating for humanity to become a multi-planetary species, rooted in a love for what exists and a desire to preserve it from existential threats. [19]

Learn more:

Lessons from Eric Weinstein

On Truth, Meaning, and Reality

On Learning and Education

On Institutions and Society

On Physics and Geometric Unity

On Personal Growth and Mindset

Written by Antoine Buteau

Lessons from Force Management

Lessons from Mark Suster