Lessons from Sid Meier

A titan of the video game industry, Sid Meier has left an indelible mark on the world of interactive entertainment. His name is synonymous with the strategy genre, most notably for the creation of the enduring Civilization series. Through his work and various talks, he has shared a wealth of knowledge about game design, creativity, and the player experience.

The Core Philosophy: Interesting Decisions

Meier's most famous contribution to game design theory is his definition of games. This central idea has influenced countless developers.

"A game is a series of interesting choices." This is Meier's most iconic quote, summarizing his belief that compelling gameplay stems from giving the player meaningful decisions.[1][2][3][4]
"In an interesting choice, no single option is clearly better than the other options, the options are not equally attractive, and the player must be able to make an informed choice." This elaboration breaks down what makes a decision compelling and strategic.[4]
"Insignificant decisions take just as much brain power as interesting ones, but without any of the satisfaction." This highlights the importance of ensuring that the choices presented to the player have a meaningful impact on the game.[5]
"The core of the gameplay is really the player understanding what's happening and projecting into the future, what they want to do next, what might happen next." This speaks to the strategic mindset that interesting decisions are meant to foster.[6]
"A game must be about human choice, and there is basically no point in playing a game that is paint by numbers with set paths." This reinforces his belief in player agency and the avoidance of predetermined outcomes.[2]
"We want you to understand that choices have consequences...not because we've told you, but because you've faced those complex dilemmas for yourself." This quote from his memoir emphasizes the power of learning through direct experience in games.[5]

On the Player Experience

For Meier, the player is the most crucial element of any game. His design philosophy consistently prioritizes the player's feelings and experience.

"The player should be the star." A fundamental tenet of his design approach, emphasizing that the game should empower the player and make them feel central to the experience.[7][8]
"Other works of art are successful when the performer is interesting, but a game is successful only when the player is interesting." This quote beautifully illustrates the unique interactive nature of games.[5][9]
"Our job is to impress you with yourself, and on that, we have a monopoly." A powerful statement about the goal of making players feel clever and accomplished.[5][9]
"A good game impresses you with what you're doing. I think that's a fundamental difference that I as a game designer need to recede in the background." This highlights the idea that the designer's hand should be invisible, allowing the player to feel in control.[1]
"When good things happen in a game world, they often consider it their own doing, or accomplishment. But when something bad happens, they're quick to blame it on the developer." An insightful observation into player psychology that designers must account for.[10]
"It's important that the player understand why those [bad] things happened, and especially how to prevent that from happening the next time." This turns negative experiences into learning opportunities and encourages replayability.[11][12]
"Games were not just a diversion, I realized. Games could make you feel." A reflection on the emotional power of interactive entertainment.[5][13]

The "Find the Fun" Approach

Meier advocates for an iterative and prototype-driven design process, where the primary goal is to discover the core fun of the game as early as possible.

"Our approach to making games is to find the fun first and then use the technology to enhance the fun." This prioritizes the gameplay experience over technological bells and whistles.[1]
"The primary job of a game designer is not to make something fun, but to find the fun." This suggests that fun is an inherent quality of a topic that the designer's job is to unearth and present to the player.[5][13]
"I think that in life, as in game design, you have to find the fun. There is joy out there waiting to be discovered, but it might not be where you expected." A quote from his memoir that extends his design philosophy to life itself.[5][14]
"Our philosophy is to find the fun first and do a lot of prototyping and a lot of iterating very early on." This practical advice emphasizes the importance of hands-on experimentation.[7]
"There are probably more projects that I've worked on that haven't turned into final games than have." This reveals his willingness to abandon ideas that aren't proving to be fun, a key part of the iterative process.[7]
"Dinosaurs was a cool idea, but we just couldn't find a way to make it really fun." The famous "dinosaur game" is his go-to example of an idea that seemed great on paper but didn't work in practice.[1][15]

Practical Rules and Methodologies

Over the years, Meier has shared several practical rules of thumb for game development.

The "Double It or Cut It in Half" Rule. When a change is needed, make it a dramatic one to see a noticeable effect and learn more from the iteration.[8][16]
"One good game is better than two great games." This speaks to the danger of feature creep and the importance of focusing on a single, cohesive design rather than trying to cram in too many disparate ideas.[8]
Always have short, medium, and long-term goals for the player. This structure keeps the player engaged and always gives them something to strive for.[17]
"We use an iterative prototyping process...That way, we know that the game is fun from the very beginning." This again emphasizes his core belief in prototyping and continuous playtesting.[18]
"If you're making it, you might as well make it epic!" A philosophy that has clearly guided the grand scale of games like Civilization.[7]
"Take action as quickly and repeatedly as possible, take advantage of what you already know, and take liberties with tradition." A concise summary of his approach to creative problem-solving.[5][14]
"Mistakes are a given, and the important thing is to catch as many as you can, as fast as you can." This encourages a mindset where mistakes are seen as an inevitable and useful part of the development process.[19]

On Technology, Graphics, and Realism

Meier has a pragmatic view of the role of technology and realism in games, always subordinating them to the needs of the gameplay.

"I came up in the school that the game has got to be really interesting and fun to play because you're not going to wow anybody with how it looks." Reflecting on his origins in an era of limited graphics, this highlights his focus on core mechanics.[20]
"No matter how good the graphics are, and how good your technology is, the player can always imagine something more compelling and more dynamic." An argument for leaving some things to the player's imagination.[10]
He emphasizes the "fun parts" of a simulation and throws out the rest. This explains why his games are often historical in theme but not rigidly realistic.[15]
"We want people to be able to play the game and understand it as quickly as possible... we want people to feel they are immediately making progress." This is a justification for abstracting complex systems and leveraging players' existing knowledge.[21]
"Making Civilization turn-based was an accessibility decision." He realized that a real-time system didn't give players enough time to grapple with the game's complex systems.[22]
"I think computing power is ready to do 3D justice. It was great for shooters and racing games in the past, but I didn't think it was right for strategy games." This shows his thoughtful consideration of how technology impacts specific genres.[1]

On Creativity and the Designer's Role

Meier's thoughts on creativity often reflect a humble, practical, and collaborative approach.

"Game design is so much... I'll claim it's an art form. There's no recipe for success. It's an experimental process or process of iteration." Acknowledging both the artistic and scientific aspects of game development.[7]
"The big moments rarely do, I think, and the danger of retroactive mythologizing is that it makes people want to hold out for something dramatic, rather than throwing themselves into every opportunity." Wise advice on the nature of career-defining moments.[5][13]
"I'm an introvert who likes people: I want to collaborate on the whole, but do my part individually." A personal reflection on his preferred working style.[5][13]
"It's got to be somebody's vision." While collaborative, he acknowledges that a game needs a clear, guiding vision.[6]
"Adventuring didn't have to mean blindly groping for a set path. It could mean making up your own story, being in charge of your fate." A core belief that has shaped the open-ended nature of his most famous games.[19]
"Whatever it is you want to be good at, you have to make sure you continue to read, and learn, and seek joy elsewhere, because you never know where inspiration will strike." An encouragement for designers to be curious and draw inspiration from a wide range of sources.[5]
"I refused to declare one choice superior, because it was the player's story, not mine." This again underscores his commitment to player agency.[19]
"Copying another game is not really that exciting. It's making a better one." A comment on the motivation to innovate rather than imitate.[23]

On the Psychology of Play

In his talks, Meier often delves into the psychological aspects of why people play games and how designers can tap into those motivations.

"Basically, if you play Civilization, you are an egomaniac." A humorous but insightful take on the power fantasy that his games provide.[11][12]
"Protect the player from themselves." He notes that players will sometimes optimize the fun out of a game (e.g., by constantly saving and reloading), and the designer's job is to prevent this.[12]
"A game should be challenging, but not frustrating." Capturing the delicate balance required to keep a player engaged.[24]
"Plant the idea of 'next time' in the player's mind." Designing for replayability by making players think about what they could do differently in a future session.[25]
"Learning is very exciting. We like to introduce learning into a game without making it feel educational." The distinction between engaging, self-directed learning and boring, forced education.[21]
"A good game is like a good book, you can lose yourself in it for hours." This highlights the immersive and captivating potential of well-designed games.[24]
"The best games are the ones that allow players to be creative and make their own choices." A simple, powerful summary of the value of player freedom.[24]
"It's not the size of the game in your mind, it's the size of the idea that you bring to it." Emphasizing that a strong core concept is more important than sheer scale or complexity.[24]
"The player can actually destroy the experience at any time they want to... and as a game designer, we can mess up the game as well." He describes the relationship between player and designer as a kind of "unholy alliance" where both agree to uphold the fantasy of the game.[10][11]
"That sense of having gone through an epic adventure is what we're trying to create with the Civ experience." A clear statement of the intended emotional takeaway from his most famous creation.[6]

Sources