Lessons from Venkatesh Rao

A leading thinker in the realms of technology, culture, and organizational dynamics, Venkatesh Rao is a prolific writer and consultant known for his iconoclastic insights. Through his long-running blog Ribbonfarm, his book Tempo, and his influential series The Gervais Principle and Breaking Smart, Rao has developed a unique lens for viewing the modern world. His work often challenges conventional wisdom, offering frameworks for understanding complex systems and navigating the ambiguities of contemporary life.

On Organizations and Power Dynamics (The Gervais Principle)

The Gervais Principle in a Nutshell: "Sociopaths, in their own best interests, knowingly promote over-performing Losers into middle-management, groom under-performing Losers into Sociopaths, and leave the average bare-minimum-effort Losers to fend for themselves." [1][2]
The Three Tiers of Office Life: Rao categorizes office workers into three groups: Sociopaths, the Clueless, and Losers, based on the TV show "The Office." Sociopaths prioritize power, the Clueless don't understand workplace dynamics, and Losers lack the ambition to climb the corporate ladder. [3][4]
Power-Awareness as the Great Differentiator: The key distinction between the three types is their level of awareness of the true, often harsh, realities of organizational power. Sociopaths see it clearly, the Clueless are deluded by idealized notions, and Losers are resigned to their economic bargain. [1][4]
The Rationality of Slacking Off: For the "Loser" who has made a bad economic bargain (trading freedom for a steady paycheck), the most rational approach is to do the minimum required. Doing more is a "Clueless" trait. [1]
The Danger of Over-performing: If you over-perform at the Loser level, you are marked as an exploitable, clueless individual because you are delivering more value than your bargain necessitates without negotiating for more. [1]
The Language of Power: "Power talk" is the subtle language used by Sociopaths to negotiate status, value, and resources. If you can't speak it, you will likely be outmaneuvered. [4]
Organizational Literacy Has a Cost: Learning to see organizations as they truly are is an irreversible process. It forces you to take responsibility for your own decisions and can be an uncomfortable awakening. [5]
The Peter Principle vs. The Gervais Principle: While the Peter Principle suggests people are promoted to their level of incompetence, Rao argues that the most competent "Losers" are promoted to middle management (the Clueless layer) to harness their work ethic, not that the least competent are promoted to limit their damage. [2][6]
Two Exits for Losers: According to Rao, a "Loser" has two potential paths out of their situation: become a Sociopath or adopt a "bare-minimum" performance strategy. [1]
The Role of the Clueless: The Clueless middle management layer is essential for the functioning of the organization, as they genuinely believe in the corporate mission and work diligently, providing a buffer between the Sociopaths and the Losers. [4][7]

On Perception, Strategy, and Decision-Making (Tempo)

The Primacy of Narrative Rationality: Humans often make decisions based on stories and narratives rather than pure calculation. This "narrative rationality" is a powerful, albeit potentially biased, way of making sense of the world. [8]
The Three Elements of Tempo: Tempo is comprised of rhythm, emotion, and energy. Understanding and influencing these elements is key to managing the momentum of any situation. [9]
Emotion as a Signal of Tempo Mismatch: "Emotion is the result of tempo of the environment not meeting expectations." [8]
The Unevenness of Time: Rao encourages thinking of time not as a smooth, continuous flow, but as a "bumpy, uneven ride," which is more aligned with our narrative-driven minds. [10]
Situation Awareness as an Active Process: True understanding of a situation requires active immersion and maintenance; it degrades when you are not engaged. [9]
The Value of the Plan is in the Planning: "The process of planning is very valuable, for forcing you to think hard about what you are doing, but the actual plan that results from it is probably useless." [11]
The Power of Mental Models: Mental models are frameworks for understanding the world. Rao emphasizes the importance of having a diverse and constantly updated set of models to navigate complexity. [12]
You Get What You Negotiate: A recurring theme in Rao's work is that outcomes are not determined by fairness or merit alone: "you don't get what you deserve; you get what you negotiate." [11]
The Two Greek Gods of Time: Rao distinguishes between Chronos (linear, objective clock time) and Kairos (subjective, opportune moments). He argues that we are moving from a world dominated by Chronos to one where Kairos is re-emerging. [13]
Thinking Digital is Using Clocks Less: The digital age, in Rao's view, is less about the computers themselves and more about the shift away from the rigid, industrial-era conception of time. [13]

On Modern Life and Culture

The Rise of "Premium Mediocre": This is a key concept coined by Rao to describe products, services, and experiences that offer an illusion of luxury and exclusivity but are fundamentally mediocre. Examples include "artisan" pizza, truffle oil on fries, and extra-leg-room economy seats. [6][14]
The Psychology of Premium Mediocre: It's an adaptive response, particularly for millennials, to a state of economic precarity. It allows for a taste of the high life without the actual cost, and it "Instagrams better than it tastes." [14][15]
Premium Mediocre is a Conscious Choice: "Maya Millennial is aware that what she is consuming is mediocre at its core, and only 'premium' in some peripheral...ways. But she consumes it anyway." [5]
"Legibility" and its Dangers: Borrowing from James C. Scott, Rao explores the concept of "legibility"—the simplification of complex systems to make them easier to control. He warns that this often leads to an oversimplification that masks the true, messy nature of reality. [16]
The Importance of Embracing Complexity: Rao's work consistently argues against neat categorizations and for the necessity of grappling with the world's inherent complexity. [16]
"Breaking Smart": This refers to the idea of shedding old, outdated "scripts" and mental models to adapt to a world being reshaped by technology. It's about being clever and adaptable in the face of systemic change. [17]
The Shift from "Being Smart" to "Being Good": Rao observes a cultural shift, particularly among younger generations, away from the 80s and 90s ideal of "smartness" (cleverness, irony, rule-breaking) towards a more earnest focus on "being good." [17]
Rhizomatic vs. Arborescent Structures: He uses this distinction to describe different ways of organizing information and organizations. "Arborescent" structures are hierarchical (like a tree), while "rhizomatic" ones are non-hierarchical and interconnected (like a root system), which he argues is more representative of our current reality. [18]
The Spreadsheet as the Archetypal Rhizomatic Tool: The ability to cut, paste, and connect disparate pieces of information in a non-linear way makes the spreadsheet a key tool for navigating rhizomatic environments. [18]
Navigating the Rhizome: "In a rhizomatic world, if your expectations and work habits are built around architectural cleanliness, you will get deeply frustrated and be perennially frozen." [18]

On Personal Growth and Learning

The Danger of Reflection: "Reflection is a dangerous pastime. It can lead you to rewrite your past, alter how you see your present, and tempt you down paths you never imagined you would explore." [11]
Development is Arrested by Strengths, Not Weaknesses: We often get stuck in our development because we become addicted to the social rewards that come from a particular strength, preventing us from growing in other areas. [1][2]
The Mediocre Develop Fastest: Those who are not exceptionally talented or untalented in a particular area are often more adaptable and develop more quickly because they are not held back by a strength-based addiction. [1][2]
To Find Your Way, Start by Getting Lost: Rao advocates for intentionally divergent thinking and learning, exploring a wide range of interests to build a rich internal model of the world. [19]
The Power of Dialectic: Meaningful insights often emerge from conversations and "conversational sparring," where ideas are tested and refined through dialogue. [20]
"Be Somebody" vs. "Do Something": "If you instinctively envision yourself in the future, at the peak of your life, you are a be somebody person. If you instinctively envision the impact you might have had, and are fuzzy on what you personally will be like, you are a do something type." [11]
Your Most Stable Beliefs are About Momentum Management: More than grand life purposes, our behavior is often governed by the practical beliefs we hold about managing our personal energy and momentum. [11]
The Impermanence of Online Work: "There are many things about the organic evolution of a blogamatic universe that cannot be captured by a set of ebooks, no matter how carefully curated. And that is perhaps as it should be." [21]
The Inevitability of Loose Ends: Reflecting on his own body of work, Rao accepts that projects are often destined to end in "a bunch of unsatisfying loose ends," which he finds a darkly pleasing thought. [21]
On Self-Discovery: "Decipher your scars and figure out what lock in the universe life has keyed you to open." [22]

Assorted Aphorisms and Insights

On Simple Answers: "For every complex question, there is an answer that is simple, elegant and wrong." [11]
On Revenge: "So revenge is obviously a deeply messed-up expression of vindictiveness. It is hard to even call it 'evil.' It is just plain insanity. A result of deeply messed-up thinking." [11]
On Finishing Creative Work: "As writers like to remark, books are never finished, they are merely abandoned." [1]
On Fairness: "All that is required is to control people who believe in fairness, is to remove any evidence suggesting that the world might fundamentally not be a fair place, and mask it appropriately with a justice principle such as an afterlife calculus, or a retirement fantasy." [11]
On Pluralism and Technology: "Shared languages and currencies allow more people to harmoniously co-exist, despite conflicting values... We should therefore expect software eating the world to cause an explosion in the variety of possible lifestyles." [4]
On Independent Thought: To have an independent mind, you don't need immense willpower; you just need to discipline yourself to be at the "intersection of many divergent streams of intellectual influence." [4]
On the Nature of Beliefs: "Beliefs create or constrain possibilities, desires lead to preferences among them, and intentions represent commitments to specific courses of action." [11]
On the Greek Concept of Hamartia: Rao often references the Greek idea of a "fatal error born of unavoidable ignorance," suggesting that tragedy is often a result of such blind spots. [11]
On Action vs. Observation: "In many domains, you can only develop situation awareness by acting, not by observing." [19]
On the Future: Rao's work suggests a future of "multitemporality," where the single, objective clock time gives way to a fragmented landscape of subjective, individually programmed realities. [8][13]

Learn more:

Lessons from Venkatesh Rao

On Organizations and Power Dynamics (The Gervais Principle)

On Perception, Strategy, and Decision-Making (Tempo)

On Modern Life and Culture

On Personal Growth and Learning

Assorted Aphorisms and Insights

Written by Antoine Buteau

Lessons from Mark Spitznagel

Lessons from Tim Urban