The Capital Allocation Theory of Growth — Series Index

Growth becomes a capital-allocation problem when every metric must inform where the next dollar goes. The sequence builds from payback, incrementality, and net growth toward a practical metric stack, failure analysis, and a disciplined allocation review.

The Capital Allocation Theory of Growth Series #10: The Growth Allocation Review

A growth review earns its name only when evidence changes allocation. Starting from the business model and current constraint, leaders should issue explicit next-dollar recommendations, record their reasoning, and match each decision’s cadence to the arrival of new evidence.

The Capital Allocation Theory of Growth Series #9: Growth Metrics Failure Modes

Growth metrics become dangerous when asked to prove too much. Naming what each measure establishes, conceals, and encourages—and pairing it with a corrective companion—keeps LTV, CAC, ROAS, payback, attribution, and activity from becoming persuasive distortions.

The Capital Allocation Theory of Growth Series #8: When Payback Is Not Enough

Payback disciplines cash recovery but cannot rank a growth portfolio alone. Operators must weigh return, scale, liquidity, risk, and strategic option value so small efficient channels, large opportunities, and experimental bets receive funding suited to their roles.

The Capital Allocation Theory of Growth Series #7: The CFO Theory of Growth

Growth and finance work best as productive counterweights: one protects learning, the other cash. A shared investment language—payback, contribution, timing, confidence, saturation, and downside—turns budget conflict into explicit portfolio choices about what to scale, test, cap, or kill.

The Capital Allocation Theory of Growth Series #6: The Metric Stack for Growth Operators

Growth measurement should climb from activity and efficiency through customer quality and capital recovery to allocation. Each layer answers a different question and checks the one below, preventing motion, attractive funnels, or fast payback from standing in for durable value.

The Capital Allocation Theory of Growth Series #5: Attribution Is Not Incrementality

Attribution assigns credit; incrementality tests causality. Because marginal spending should fund behavior that would not otherwise occur, channel claims need counterfactual evidence and a net-payback lens that includes margin, retention, refunds, and support costs before budgets rise.

The Capital Allocation Theory of Growth Series #4: The Next Dollar Is the Only Dollar That Matters

Historical averages cannot justify the next increment of spending. Mapping marginal returns by tier, audience, region, or segment reveals saturation and lets operators distinguish excellent early dollars, acceptable expansion, strategic risk, and vanity before blended performance hides decay.

Choose your reading rhythm.

Start with a weekly briefing, add daily notes, or hear only when a durable essay or research update is ready.

You've successfully subscribed to Antoine Buteau
You've successfully subscribed to Antoine Buteau
Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.